Neue Längsschnitt-Studie aus der Verhaltensgenetik zur Anlage-Umwelt-Interaktion: Unterschiedliche Anfälligkeit für Delinquenz bei männlichen vs. weiblichen Jugendlichen?

Journal of Youth and Adolescence April 2016, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 730-745

Sex Differences in Sources of Resilience and Vulnerability to Risk for Delinquency

  • Jamie Newsome Affiliated with Department of Criminal Justice, University of Texas at San Antonio Email author View author's OrcID profile
  • Jamie C. Vaske Affiliated with Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Western Carolina University
  • Krista S. Gehring Affiliated with Department of Criminal Justice, University of Houston-Downtown
  • Danielle L. Boisvert Affiliated with College of Criminal Justice, Sam Houston State University


Research on adolescent risk factors for delinquency has suggested that, due to genetic differences, youth may respond differently to risk factors, with some youth displaying resilience and others a heightened vulnerability.

Using a behavioral genetic design and data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, this study examines whether there are sex differences in the genetic and environmental factors that influence the ways in which adolescents respond to cumulative risk for violent, nonviolent, and overall delinquency in a sample of twins (152 MZ male, 155 MZ female, 140 DZ male, 130 DZ female, and 204 DZ opposite-sex twin pairs).

The results revealed that males tended to show greater vulnerability to risk for all types of delinquency, and females exhibited greater resilience.

Among males, additive genetic factors accounted for 41, 29, and 43 % of the variance in responses to risk for violent, nonviolent, and overall delinquency, respectively. The remaining proportion of variance in each model was attributed to unique environmental influences, with the exception of 11 % of the variance in nonviolent responses to risk being attributed to common environmental factors.

Among females, no significant genetic influences were observed; however, common environmental contributions to differences in the ways females respond to risk for violent, nonviolent, and overall delinquency were 44, 42, and 45 %, respectively. The remaining variance was attributed to unique environmental influences.

Overall, genetic factors moderately influenced males’ responses to risk while environmental factors fully explain variation in females’ responses to risk. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of improving the understanding of relationships between risks and outcomes, as well as informing policy and practice with adolescent offenders.